Jonathan Speck v. Aleyda K. Mejia

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 2, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1978 Lower Tribunal No. 16-30379 ________________ Jonathan Speck, Appellant, vs. Aleyda K. Mejia, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christina Marie DiRaimondo, Judge. Jonathan Speck, in proper person. Fuste Law, P.A., and Luis M. Fuste, for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Eagle FL VI SPE, LLC v. T & A Family P’ship, Ltd., 177 So. 3d 1277, 1279 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (“[W]e review the trial court’s decision on a motion to set aside a settlement agreement for an abuse of discretion.”); Pierce v. Pierce, 128 So. 3d 204, 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“[A]s a general rule, ‘[t]he standard for disregarding a settlement agreement between parties is high’ and ‘“the fact that one party to the agreement apparently made a bad bargain is not a sufficient ground, by itself, to vacate or modify a settlement agreement.”’” (quoting Griffith v. Griffith, 860 So. 2d 1069, 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003))); Lane v. Fuller, 387 So. 3d 462, 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (“An abuse of discretion standard [ ] applies to an ‘order modifying a parenting plan and timesharing schedule.’” (citation omitted)); Alvares-Watters v. Watters, 387 So. 3d 327, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (“The trial court’s decision as to the school designation should be guided by what is in the child’s best interest.”). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.