PLUMER II V. U.S. BANK
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 22, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-2207 Lower Tribunal No. 13-20103 ________________ Richard Plumer II, Appellant, vs. U.S. Bank, National Association, etc., Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Richard Plumer II, in proper person. McGlinchey Stafford, and Charles E. Stoecker, and William L. Grimsley (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and MILLER JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Plumer, II v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 250 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); see also Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So. 2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (The “doctrine [of law of the case states] that those points of law adjudicated in a prior appeal are binding in order to promote stability of judicial decisions and to avoid piecemeal litigation.” (citation omitted)); Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So. 2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“A per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court's opinion or not.” (citation omitted)). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
