Ronald W. Hendricks v. State of Florida

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC10-1275 ____________ RONALD W. HENDRICKS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [January 31, 2013] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in Hendricks v. State, 34 So. 3d 819 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss the review proceeding. It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur. PARIENTE and LABARGA, JJ., recused. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct Conflict of Decisions First District - Case No. 1D09-357 (Duval County) William J. Sheppard, Daniel Gray Thomas, Matthew R. Kachergus and Bryan Everett Demaggio of Sheppard, White, Thomas & Kachergus, P.A., Jacksonville, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, and Thomas Howland Duffy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.