MIA Consulting Group, Inc. v. Hacienda Villa, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC10-2408 ____________ MIA CONSULTING GROUP, INC., Petitioner, vs. HACIENDA VILLAS, INC., Respondent. [April 12, 2012] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Hacienda Villas, Inc. v. MIA Consulting Group, Inc, 47 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Direct Conflict of Decisions Third District - Case No. 3D10-1331 (Dade County) Brian J. Stack and Sammy Epelbaum of Stack Fernandez Anderson and Harris, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Petitioner David T. Weisbrod, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.