Robert J. Reardon v. State of Florida
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-1395 ____________ ROBERT J. REARDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [January 3, 2002] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in State v. Reardon, 763 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with Thompson v. State, 650 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 1994), Goodwin v. State, 634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994), and Sirmons v. State, 634 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1994). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict Fifth District - Case Nos. 5D98-3154 & 5D98-3221 (Brevard County) James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and John M. Selden, Assistant Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Kellie A. Nielan, Denise O. Simpson, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
