Lawrence Scott Andrews v. The Florida Parole Commission

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC00-2333 ____________ LAWRENCE SCOTT ANDREWS, Petitioner, vs. The FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Respondents. [July 13, 2001] PER CURIAM. We initially accepted jurisdiction of Andrews v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 768 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), based upon the First District Court of Appeal s certification of a question of great public importance. Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J. dissents. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED. Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal Direct Conflict First District - Case No. 1D98-1931 (Leon County) John D. Middleton and R. Mitchell Prugh of Middleton & Prugh, P.A., Melrose, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Louis F. Hubener and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondents -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.