Hopps v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DOMINIQUE SHANTEL HOPPS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D13-5967 Opinion filed February 6, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald Ficarrotta, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brandon R. Christian, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. CASANUEVA, Judge. Dominique Shantel Hopps appeals her judgments and sentences imposed for one count of delivery of cannabis and one count of possession of cannabis (less than twenty grams) following a jury trial. Ms. Hopps was sentenced to time served on the possession charge and three years' prison followed by two years' drug offender probation on the delivery charge, with a special condition of probation calling for no early termination of probation. We affirm the judgments and sentences without discussion except as to the condition of no early termination of probation. The trial court erred by imposing "a special condition of probation that purports to divest the Department of Corrections (DOC) of its authority to recommend early termination." Murphy v. State, 976 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); see also Baker v. State, 619 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) ("[A] trial judge is not authorized to divest the Department of Corrections of its authority to recommend early termination of probation."). Ms. Hopps raised this issue in a motion to correct sentencing error, which was timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to strike this special condition of probation and to correct the sentence and probation order so that the DOC is aware that the special condition no longer exists. We affirm in all other respects. Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for correction of sentence and probation order. KELLY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.