Glaum v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRUCE M. GLAUM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No. 2D13-2675 Opinion filed February 7, 2014. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Angela J. Cowden, Judge. PER CURIAM. We affirm the denial of Bruce M. Glaum's motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he raised two issues. We note that the postconviction court did not address Glaum's claim that he is entitled to credit for weekends spent in county jail. However, because this claim was facially insufficient, we affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1051 n.2 (Fla. 2011). Our affirmance is without prejudice for Glaum to file a facially sufficient motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. Affirmed without prejudice. SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.