Hannah v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT THADDEUS HANNAH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D05-4122 Opinion filed August 4, 2006. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Ronald N. Ficarrotta, Judge. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne Sheer Weiner, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. ALTENBERND, Judge. Thaddeus Hannah appeals a final order revoking his community control. We strike the court s finding that Mr. Hannah violated condition eight because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Mr. Hannah willfully and substantially violated this condition. See Oates v. State, 872 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Hanania v. State, 855 So. 2d 92, 94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)). However, the State proved that Mr. Hannah willfully and substantially violated conditions nine and twelve of his community control. Because we conclude the trial court would have exercised the discretion to revoke Mr. Hannah s community control based on the violations of conditions nine and twelve, we affirm the order revoking probation. On remand, the revocation order should be amended to show violations of conditions nine and twelve only. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
