Guevara-Rodriguez v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EULICE GUEVARA-RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D05-4110 Opinion filed July 7, 2006. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Peter A. Dubensky, Judge. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diana K. Bock, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. CANADY, Judge. In this appeal briefed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Eulice Guevara-Rodriguez challenges her convictions and sentences for interference with child custody, giving a false name, having no valid vehicle registration, grand theft of a motor vehicle, possession of drug paraphernalia, false imprisonment, and driving with a suspended license after prior violations. We affirm GuevaraRodriguez's convictions without comment. We also affirm the sentences as imposed. We write only to point out that the State's concession of error as to the imposition of the $3 teen court cost was erroneous. Guevara-Rodriguez failed to preserve that issue because she did not raise the matter at the sentencing hearing or file a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Affirmed. DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.