Okoh v. Okoh

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LISA M. OKOH, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES I. OKOH, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Case No. 2D04-5295 Opinion filed October 12, 2005. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Charles Ed Bergmann, Judge. Lisa M. Okoh, pro se. Lorena L. Kiely of Law Office of Lorena L. Kiely, Tampa (withdrew after initial briefing), for Appellant. Caroline K. Black, Tampa, and Ingrid Anderson, Clearwater, for Appellee. SALCINES, Judge. In this difficult case, we are bound by the standard of review, which is whether the trial court's decision to set aside or uphold a marital settlement agreement was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Hjortaas v. McCabe, 656 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Maas v. Maas, 440 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We cannot reweigh the evidence, and the record does not reflect that the trial court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the trial court's order on the enforceability of the written marital settlement agreement is affirmed. Affirmed. WHATLEY and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.