Brown v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ADRIAN DEVAN BROWN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No. 2D04-2195 Opinion filed September 9, 2005. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Douglas S. Connor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. LaROSE, Judge. Adrian Devan Brown appeals his conviction and fifteen-year sentence for aggravated battery. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial due to fundamental error in the self-defense jury instructions given at his trial. We agree and reverse. The self-defense instruction given at trial was disapproved as circuitous and misleading in Giles v. State, 831 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), a case decided almost ten months prior to Mr. Brown s trial. We have held that this instruction is fundamental, reversible error. See, e.g., Bates v. State, 883 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Velazquez v. State, 884 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Zuniga v. State, 869 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Trial counsel did not object and, as the record before us reveals, unknowingly acquiesced to a fundamentally flawed jury instruction. See Roberts v. State, 694 So. 2d 825, 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Beckham v. State, 884 So. 2d 969, 972-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We reverse and remand for a new trial. WHATLEY and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
