Stokes v. State

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GEORGE STOKES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2D04-1966 Opinion filed August 6, 2004 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); O'Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Wright v. State, 834 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Dixon v. State, 812 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 831 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 2002). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D1716 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003). Affirmed; conflict certified. STRINGER, VILLANTI, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur. 2