D.Z. v. Department of Children and Family Services
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In the Interest of D.A.G. and T.G., children. ) ) ) D.Z. and D.P., ) ) Appellants, ) v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILY SERVICES, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Case No. 2D03-4375 Opinion filed July 30, 2004. Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Pasco County; William R. Webb, Judge. Eugene L. Beil of Beil & Hay, P.A., Hudson, for Appellants. Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Andrea Lasker Bradford, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. D.Z. and D.P. (the Relatives), the maternal great-grandfather and the maternal grandmother, respectively, of D.A.G. and T.G., seek review of the trial court's nonfinal order denying their motion for visitation. We do not have jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order as an interlocutory appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3). However, we elect to treat the Relatives' timely filed notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c). We deny the petition. See Sullivan v. Sapp, 866 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 2004); A.D. v. K.S. (In re S.D.), 869 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Petition denied. DAVIS, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
