State v. Register
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) WILLIE REGISTER, ) ) Appellee. ) ) _____________________________________ ) Case No. 2D02-2098 Opinion filed June 4, 2003. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Michael McCarthy, Judge. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee. FULMER, Judge. The State appeals the trial court's order imposing community control and probation after Willie Register pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The State argues that the trial court was required to impose a three-year minimum mandatory prison sentence. We reverse. Under section 775.087(2)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2000), a felon convicted of possession of a firearm must be sentenced to a three-year minimum mandatory term, but this enhancement applies only in cases of actual, not constructive, possession. See Bundrage v. State, 814 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Cook v. State, 816 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); State v. Keen, 782 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The trial court erroneously believed that the minimum mandatory sentence did not apply when a felon was convicted of possession of a firearm only; the trial court thought that there needed to be a separate, additional offense to trigger the enhancement. This interpretation, however, is directly contrary to the plain language of section 775.087(2)(a)(1), which states "that a person who is convicted for aggravated assault, possession of a firearm by a felon, or burglary of a conveyance shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment if such person possessed a 'firearm' or 'destructive device' during the commission of the offense." Because of the trial court's erroneous interpretation of the statute, the trial court did not focus on the pertinent question of whether Register had actual or constructive possession of the firearm. There is no direct evidence on this point, and conflicting inferences may be taken from the record. Therefore, we reverse. On remand, if the trial court determines that Register was in actual possession of a firearm, the trial court shall impose the three-year minimum mandatory sentence. Reversed and remanded. DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., Concur. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
