GEORGE MARTIN vs EDEL WEISS ELDEMIRE-MARTIN

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GEORGE MARTIN, Appellant, v. EDEL WEISS ELDEMIRE-MARTIN, Appellee. No. 4D19-3398 [November 12, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dale C. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 15-2351 (37). George Odom, Jr. of Dixon & Odom, Fort Lauderdale, and Valerie Small-Williams of the Law Office of Valerie Small-Williams, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. KUNTZ, J. The Former Husband appeals the circuit court’s writ of bodily attachment and order finding him in contempt for failure to pay lump-sum alimony. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that the Former Husband had notice of the hearing. But because the Former Husband did not attend the hearing, the circuit court had to satisfy the requirements of Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.615(c)(2)(B). The rule states that if the contemnor fails to appear for the contempt hearing, then the court shall set a reasonable purge amount based on the individual circumstances of the parties. The court may issue a writ of bodily attachment and direct that, upon execution of the writ of bodily attachment, the alleged contemnor be brought before the court within 48 hours for a hearing on whether the alleged contemnor has the present ability to pay support and, if so, whether the failure to pay such support is willful. Id. The circuit court set a purge amount of $621,075.00 but did not consider whether this amount was “a reasonable purge amount based on the individual circumstances of the parties.” See id.; see also Lowe v. Lowe, 948 So. 2d 836, 838 (Fla. 4th 2007) (holding the purge amount was reasonable based on the parties’ individual circumstances). As a result, we reverse the court’s writ of bodily attachment and remand for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded. GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.