Mathers v. Brown
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2009 WILLIAM MARTIN MATHERS, Appellant, v. NANCY VIRGINIA BROWN, Appellee. No. 4D08-1470 [December 9, 2009] ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. Appellant s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied. DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur. GROSS, C.J., concurs specially with opinion. GROSS, C.J., concurring specially in the denying of the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Appellant s motion for rehearing en banc was directed at the issue of prejudgment interest. In the proper case, when the issue is before us, this court should recede en banc from Chapman v. Chapman, 866 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), and O Neill v. O Neill, 868 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Read together, these cases hold that the appreciation in the value of a non-marital brokerage account during a marriage is a marital asset to the extent that it exceeds the passive appreciation in the brokerage account as measured by an appropriate stock index. These cases have gone beyond the language of the statute to create complexity where a spouse brings assets to a marriage. Chapman and O Neill involved the application of two subsections of section 61.075, Florida Statutes (2008). First, subsections 61.075(6)(a)1.a. and b. include in the definition of marital asset : a. Assets acquired and liabilities incurred during the marriage, individually by either spouse or jointly by them. b. [T]he enhancement in value and appreciation of nonmarital assets resulting either from the efforts of either party during the marriage or from the contribution to or expenditure thereon of marital funds or other forms of marital assets, or both. Second, under subsections 61.075(6)(b)1., and 3., nonmarital assets include: 1. Assets acquired . . . by either party prior to the marriage, and assets acquired . . . in exchange for such assets . . . 3. All income derived from nonmarital assets during the marriage unless the income was treated, used, or relied upon by the parties as a marital asset. It is the individual securities in a brokerage account that are chapter 61 assets, not a brokerage account as a whole. Our case law improperly focuses on the appreciation of the account rather than the assets held in it. These statutes do not require that appreciation of stocks in a nonmarital brokerage account during a marriage be treated as marital assets. It is the individual stocks that are the assets in a brokerage account and the stocks do not appreciate as a result of marital effort. Chapter 61 does not define an asset. One common definition is an item that is owned and has value. Black s Law Dictionary 125 (8th ed. 2004). When it comes to a brokerage account containing individual stocks that a spouse brings into the marriage, it is the individual stocks that are the assets and not the brokerage account as a whole. The brokerage account is simply a convenient holding and trading mechanism for the many different stocks a person may own. The statute uses the term asset to connote something that can be acquired, something that can be bought and sold. It is the individual stocks that are acquired in the brokerage account, not the account itself. It is the individual stocks that appreciate. If a spouse owns stock in a non-marital brokerage account, unless a spouse is an officer or director of the company, the stock cannot be said to appreciate from the efforts of that spouse during the marriage. The stock does not know who owns it. Appreciation in the value of a typical stock is due to the management of the company and market forces, not to the spouse s decision to include the stock in a portfolio. Until Chapman, a reasonable reading of the statute was that it covered the direct expenditure of marital effort on an asset, such as -2- working in a small business or renovating a piece of real estate, and not the decision to own a stock. This narrow view of an asset finds support in Chapter 61. The statutory definition of non-marital assets contemplates that assets in a brokerage account can be bought and sold without altering the nonmarital designation of the assets in the account. Non-marital assets include assets acquired . . . prior to the marriage, and assets acquired . . . in exchange for such assets. ยง 61.075(6)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2008). If a non-marital stock is sold during the marriage, and other stocks, bonds, or mutual funds are acquired, they are acquired in exchange for the non-marital assets and should retain their non-marital character. This was not a case where the husband s premarital brokerage account swelled because of the contribution of marital funds. But for Chapman and O Neill, I would reverse the trial court s determination and hold that the entire amount of the husband s account was non-marital. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Martin H. Colin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502007DR003255XXXXMBFD. Barbara J. Compiani and Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, and James R. Rich of Law Office of James R. Rich, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. John D. Boykin of Casey Ciklin Lubitz Martens & O Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellee. -3-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
