Benjamin v. CR Hancock Bridge, LLC

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2008 HAROLD BENJAMIN and DONNA BENJAMIN, Appellants, v. CR HANCOCK BRIDGE, LLC, BAYSHORE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellees. No. 4D08-1419 [July 30, 2008] DAMOORGIAN, J. Harold and Donna Benjamin ( Benjamins ) appeal from a n order granting CR Hancock Bridge, LLC s ( Hancock ) motion to transfer venue from Broward County, Florida to Lee County, Florida. We affirm, writing to address only the issue of forum non conveniens. After the Benjamins brought an action against Hancock in Broward County, Hancock moved to transfer venue to Lee County on the basis that it was inconvenient for their witnesses. Included with the motion to transfer venue was an affidavit listing nine (9) witnesses Hancock would call to testify, the relevant information that they would testify to, and the assertion that all witnesses were located in and around Lee County. There is no dispute that Lee County would be a proper venue. Venue may be transferred [f]or the convenience of the parties or witnesses or in the interest of justice. ยง 47.122, Fla. Stat. (2007). Of the three reasons for transferring venue, the convenience of the witnesses has been deemed the most important consideration. Wynn Drywall, Inc. v. Aequicorp Program Adm r s, Inc., 953 So. 2d 28, 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Hancock s affidavit asserting witness inconvenience and the general, material information to which the witnesses would testify was sufficient to permit transfer of venue to Lee County. See Eggers v. Eggers, 776 So. 2d 1096, 1098 n.2 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (showing the gist of relevant knowledge of witnesses is sufficient to support a motion to transfer venue). Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in transferring venue to Lee County for forum non conveniens. Affirmed. KLEIN, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 0732237 (08). Bruce D. Friedlander of Friedlander & Kamelhair, PL, Coral Springs, for appellants. J. Michael Coleman and Sonia M. Diaz of Coleman, Hazzard & Taylor, P.A., Naples, for appellees. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.