Hampton v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2006 STEVE HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D06-3423 [November 8, 2006] PER CURIAM. Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant s filing a timely and sufficient rule 3.850 motion alleging, if he can, that he does not actually qualify for sentencing as a habitual felony offender or as a prison releasee reoffender. Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 n.5 (Fla. 2001); Adlington v. State, 840 So.2d 354 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 859 So.2d 513 (Fla. 2003); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694, 695-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). KLEIN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur. * * * Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-4814 CF10A. Steve Hampton, Lowell, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
