Mary Taylor Christensen, Former Wife vs Robert L. Christensen, Former Husband and Advertising Services, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D20-1846 _____________________________ MARY TAYLOR CHRISTENSEN, Former Wife, Appellant, v. ROBERT L. CHRISTENSEN, Former Husband, and ADVERTISING SERVICES, INC., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. John T. Brown, Judge. August 12, 2021 PER CURIAM. Mary Christensen, the former wife, appeals the trial court’s post-dissolution final judgment denying her motion for contempt and granting the former husband’s petition for modification of alimony. Because the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence and the former wife failed to show an abuse of the trial court’s discretion, we affirm. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Scott L. Terry of Florin Gray Bouzas Owens, Lutz, and Eric S. Haug of Eric S. Haug Law and Cons., PA, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Anthony C. Bisordi of Bisordi & Bisordi, P.A., Shalimar, for Appellee Robert L. Christensen. No appearance for Appellee Advertising Services, Inc. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
