Bradley Bruce vs State of Florida

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BRADLEY BRUCE, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D13-3147 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed November 26, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County. Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge. Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. This appeal was filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). As appellate counsel contends on appeal, Appellant’s motion to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), is deemed denied given that the trial court did not rule on the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B); Bass v. State, 122 So. 3d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Sixty days after the motion [to correct sentencing error filed pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2)] was filed, the trial court’s jurisdiction ended and the motion was deemed denied.”). As to the merits of Appellant’s motion, we agree with appellate counsel that the written judgment erroneously cites Appellant’s aggravated battery conviction as a violation of section 787.01(1)(a)3., Florida Statutes, instead of section 784.045(1)(a). We also agree that the trial court erred in imposing a $415 court cost pursuant to section 775.083(2), Florida Statutes, instead of the statutorily authorized fee of $50 for a felony. We, therefore, reverse and remand for correction of the written judgment and sentence to reflect the correct statute and statutory cost. As we explained in Harrison v. State, 146 So. 3d 76, 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), “If other authorized costs were consolidated in this $415.00 assessment, the trial court may re-impose the authorized sums following the appropriate procedure.” AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions. LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.