YOUNCHER WASHINGTON, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA YOUNCHER WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-0575 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed May 13, 2011. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. L. P. Haddock, Judge. Youncher Washington, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant, Youncher Washington, appeals the trial court s denial of his facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant alleges that the facts of his case support a ten-year minimum mandatory sentence under section 775.087, Florida Statutes (2008), rather than the twenty-year minimum mandatory sentence imposed. The trial court denied Appellant s motion without attaching any portions of the record refuting Appellant s claim. On appeal from an order denying a rule 3.800 motion, this Court is required to reverse unless the postconviction record conclusively shows that the appellant is not entitled to any relief. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). Initially, we note that Appellant s rule 3.800(a) motion was facially insufficient for failing to direct the court to the portions of the record that demonstrate entitlement to relief. See Baker v. State, 714 So. 2d 1167, 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). However, Appellant thereafter filed a sworn motion for rehearing wherein he cured the deficiency by pointing to specific pages in the transcript that purportedly support his allegations. See Golden v. State, 509 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We therefore reverse the order before us and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again denies relief, it shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that Appellant is not entitled to any relief. REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings. DAVIS, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.