FLORIDA RETAIL FEDERATION SELF-INSURED FUND-SUMMIT CLAIMS CENTER v. DANIEL QUINTERO and TIP TOP ENTERPRISES

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA RETAIL FEDERATION SELF-INSURED FUND-SUMMIT CLAIMS CENTER, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. CASE NO. 1D05-1623 v. DANIEL QUINTERO and TIP TOP ENTERPRISES, Appellees. Opinion filed June 28, 2005. An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Sylvia Medina-Shore, Judge. Ralph O. Anderson, Davie, for appellant. Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for appellees. PER CURIAM. Appellant, an insurance carrier, appeals an order finding that the workers compensation policy issued by it to the employer below was in full force and effect on the date of the industrial accident suffered by the claimant. The order further concludes that appellant has the duty to defend the employer in this case, must pay all workers compensation benefits, if any, owed to the claimant, and shall reimburse the employer for all benefits paid to the claimant. Because this order neither represents a final disposition of the proceedings below nor does it fall within the class of nonfinal orders appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(1), we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We acknowledge that an appeal of an order finding that the employer s workers compensation policy was in effect on the date of the claimant s injury was entertained by the court in Florida Workers Compensation Joint Underwriting Association v. Mundell, 765 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, that fact is not determinative of the jurisdictional issue, since that issue is not addressed in the court s opinion, nor is it clear that any matters other than the coverage issue were pending before the Judge of Compensation Claims at the time, as is clearly the case here. APPEAL DISMISSED. WOLF, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.