ERIC CARDOSO vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ERIC CARDOSO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 28, 2022 Appeal from the County Court for Brevard County, Aaron Peacock, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Case No. 5D22-1152 LT Case No. 2021-MM-35790 AFFIRMED. See Williams v. State, 710 So. 2d 24, 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Police officers and lay witnesses have long been permitted to testify as to their observations of a defendant’s acts, conduct, and appearance, and also to give an opinion on the defendant’s state of impairment based on those observations.”); City of Orlando v. Newell, 232 So. 2d 413, 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970) (holding that where police officer in prosecution for driving under influence of intoxicating beverages described to trial court, before expressing opinion, the defendant’s acts, conduct, appearance and statements as seen and heard by officer, officer’s opinion testimony that defendant was under influence of intoxicating beverages to the extent that his normal faculties were impaired was properly admitted).1 LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. We also reject appellant's contention that the prosecutor below engaged in improper closing argument. 1 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.