AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES vs LEIDY CASTELLANOS

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES, Appellant, Case No. 5D21-929 v. LEIDY CASTELLANOS, Appellee. _______________________________/ Opinion filed September 24, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Christy Collins, Judge. Julio E. Gil De Lamadrid, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Amir Rodriguez Robles appeals a final judgment of protection against stalking entered against her. Because she failed, after given an opportunity to do so, to provide us with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a statement of evidence approved by the trial court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory."). AFFIRMED. EVANDER, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.