CHAD R. BALDWIN vs ZMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, FLORIDA TRAVEL GROUP, LLC, MATTHEW S. WILLIAMS, PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL CENTER ,LLC, MYRON S. WILLIAMS AND FLORIDA LEISURE PRODUCTS, INC.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHAD R. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. ZMAN ENTERPRISES, LLC, FLORIDA TRAVEL GROUP, LLC, MATTHEW S. WILLIAMS, PROFESSIONAL TRAVEL CENTER, LLC, MYRON S. WILLIAMS AND FLORIDA LEISURE PRODUCTS, INC., Appellees. ________________________________/ Opinion filed June 8, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Kevin B. Weiss, Judge. Chad R. Baldwin, Orlando, pro se. Bradford Petrino, of Korshak & Associates, P.A., Casselberry, for Appellee Florida Travel Group, LLC. No Appearance for Remaining Appellees. PER CURIAM. Case Nos. 5D20-1349 5D20-1350 5D20-1351 AFFIRMED. See Everidge v. Advantage Venture Partners, Ltd., 880 So. 2d 691, 691 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“In reviewing the propriety of an order dismissing a complaint, we confine our analysis to the four corners of the complaint and accept all well pled allegations as true.”); see also Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Sunderman, 201 So. 3d 139, 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (“In determining the merits of a motion to dismiss, the trial court must limit itself to the four corners of the complaint.” (citations omitted)); Lewis v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 604 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (“The law is well settled that a motion to dismiss a complaint is not a motion for summary judgment in which the court may rely on facts adduced in depositions, affidavits, or other proofs.”). WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
