LISHAWN SHARON vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED LISHAWN SHARON, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D19-1298 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 27, 2019 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Howard O. McGillin, Jr., Judge. Lishawn Sharon, Avon Park, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the order denying Appellant’s motion for return of personal property following an evidentiary hearing. See Riley v. State, 277 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (citing Brown v. State, 613 So. 2d 569, 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“[T]he court cannot make the police department return property it does not possess.”)). Appellant’s remedy, if any, would be a civil action against the agency that had possession of the personal property. See id. AFFIRMED. LAMBERT, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.