Julius Martin v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JULIUS MARTIN, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-3222 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 24, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Mark S. Blechman, Judge. Julius Martin, Milton, pro se. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentences, but we do so without prejudice to Appellant to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(5). See Abbas v. State, 53 So. 3d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (affirming judgment and sentence following the trial court’s summary denial of the defendant’s motion to withdraw plea that was “devoid of factual allegations in support of the requested relief,” but without prejudice to the defendant filing “a timely, facially sufficient motion pursuant to [rule] 3.850”). AFFIRMED. SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.