Investor Trustee v. DLJ Mortgage

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED INVESTOR TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-3082 DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., ET AL., Appellees. ________________________________/ Opinion filed April 7, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Lisa Davidson, Judge. Jonathan F. Bull, The Liberty Law Team, Longwood; and Kelley A. Bosecker, St. Petersburg, for Appellant. David Rosenberg, Robert R. Edwards and Heidi J. Bassett, of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.. No Appearance for Appellee, Craig Kelling. PER CURIAM. Whoever purchases property that is the subject of a foreclosure lawsuit in which a mortgagee has previously filed a lis pendens is a purchaser pendente lite. See Bymel v. Bank of Am., N.A., 159 So. 3d 345, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). The law is well settled that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene or otherwise be made a party to the ongoing lawsuit. Dema Invs., LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 207 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Timucuan Props. v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 135 So. 3d 524, 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente lite is not entitled to intervene.” (quoting Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla. 1927))). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.