Reese v. Marcus

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2011 EDDIE LEE REESE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D11-474 AMY LESLIE MARCUS, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 10, 2011 Non Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Julianne Piggotte, Judge. Eddie Lee Reese, Bushnell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Eddie Lee Reese appeals from an order denying his motion to dissolve a Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Domestic Violence. He claims that the trial court erred by failing to afford him basic due process in connection with the hearing on his motion to dissolve the injunction. Because the limited record supplied by Appellant in the appendix to his brief does not support this argument, we affirm. See, e.g., Starks v. Starks, 423 So. 2d 452, 453-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (finding that without a transcript of the hearing, the appellate court is unable to ascertain whether the lower court erred; noting that "[t]he appellant retains the burden of overcoming the presumption of correctness . . . . [which] includes a demonstration of error from the record, which he must supply") (quoting Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So. 2d 13, 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (emphasis in original). AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN, LAWSON and TORPY, JJ., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.