Jarrad Whitaker v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008 JARRAD D. WHITAKER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D08-3276 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 24, 2008 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob Leblanc, Judge. Jarrad D. Whitaker, Jasper, Pro Se. No Appearance for Appellee. ORFINGER, J. Jarrad D. Whitaker appeals the trial court's denial of his "Motion for Post Conviction Relief." We reverse and remand. In his one-paragraph motion, Whitaker only alleges that "no appeal was filed do [sic] to counsel['s] premature withdrawal." He then sought a "belated direct appeal with appointment of counsel." The trial court treated the motion as one filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and summarily denied the motion. Whitaker's motion is so vague that we, like the trial court, cannot discern the relief requested or the basis for such relief. If Whitaker is attempting to obtain a belated appeal and is not seeking relief based on an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel, he should follow the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). If Whitaker intended to seek postconviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel, his motion was facially inadequate. However, under Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007), he should have been given a reasonable opportunity to amend his motion to state all rule 3.850 claims that he may have, so as not to run afoul of the proscription against successiveness. We reverse and remand with instructions that the motion be stricken in accordance with Spera and that Whitaker be given leave to amend if he can do so. We do so without prejudice so that Whitaker can file a proper petition for belated appeal in this Court if he so chooses. REVERSED and REMANDED. PALMER, C.J. and SAWAYA , J., concur. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.