Anaya v. Anaya

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008 MARCO ANAYA , Appellant, v. Case No. 5D07-3477 AMY ANAYA , Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 8, 2008. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Alan S. Apte, Judge. Francisco Colon, Jr., Maitland, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee. COHEN, J. Marco Anaya challenges the imputation of income and equitable distribution scheme contained in a final judgment of dissolution. He contends that the trial court failed to make the required findings of fact to support either determination. However, he did not bring these alleged inadequacies to the attention of the trial court by filing a motion for rehearing. A party may not complain about "inadequate findings in a dissolution case unless the alleged defect was brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing." Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); see also Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981, 987 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Accordingly, Anaya has failed to preserve these issues for appellate review. AFFIRMED. PLEUS and LAWSON, JJ., concur. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.