Good, Thomas v. Adams, Nathan et al, No. 3:2018cv00461 - Document 60 (W.D. Wis. 2019)

Court Description: OPINION and ORDER Granting 45 Motion in Limine by defendants ; Granting 49 Motion in Limine by Plaintiff ; Granting 50 Motion in Limine by Plaintiff ; Denying 51 Motion in Limine by plaintiff ; Granting in part and Denying in part 52 Motion in Limine by plaintiff ; Granting in part and Denying in part 53 Motion in Limine by plaintiff. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/23/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Voir Dire, # 2 Introductory Jury Instructions, # 3 Post Trial Instructions, # 4 Verdict) (voc)

Download PDF
Good, Thomas v. Adams, Nathan et al Doc. 60 Att. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THOMAS J. GOOD, v. Plaintiff, SPECIAL VERDICT [8/23/19 DRAFT] NATHAN ADAMS, GREG CISNEROS, and CITY OF BELOIT, 18-cv-461-jdp Defendants. We, the jury, for our special verdict, do find as follows: QUESTION 1: Did defendant Nathan Adams violate plaintiff Thomas Good’s Fourth Amendment rights by forcing him to submit to a blood draw? (Yes or No) If you answered YES to Question 1, answer Questions 2, 3, 4, and 5. If you answered NO to Question 1, STOP and do not answer any more questions. QUESTION 2: Did defendant Greg Cisneros violate plaintiff Thomas Good’s Fourth Amendment rights by failing to intervene to prevent the blood draw? (Yes or No) If you answered YES to Question 1, answer Question 3. QUESTION 3: Did the City of Beloit’s policy regarding warrantless blood draws cause the forced draw of plaintiff Thomas Good’s blood? (Yes or No) Dockets.Justia.com If you answered YES to Question 1, answer Question 4. QUESTION 4: What amount of money, if any, would fairly and adequately compensate plaintiff Thomas Good for the harm caused by the violation of his constitutional rights? ANSWER: $ If you answered YES to Question 1, answer Question 5. QUESTION 5: Did either defendant act in malicious or reckless disregard of plaintiff Thomas Good’s constitutional rights? Nathan Adams (Yes or No) Greg Cisneros (Yes or No) If you answered YES to Question 5 as to any defendant, answer Question 6. But only answer Question 6 as to those defendants for whom you answered YES to Question 5. If you answer NO to Question 5 for all defendants, STOP and do not answer any more questions. QUESTION 6: What amount of money, if any, do you award as punitive damages against the following defendants? Nathan Adams $ Greg Cisneros $ 2 __________________________________ Presiding Juror Madison, Wisconsin Date: ______________________ 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.