Brodzki v. Walworth County, No. 2:2011cv00675 - Document 5 (E.D. Wis. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/25/11 denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. (cc: via USPS to plaintiff) (dm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brodzki v. Walworth County Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANTHONY BRODZKI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-C-0675 WALWORTH COUNTY, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff Anthony Brodzki filed a complaint against Walworth County and asks for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint is incomprehensible, but it appears that plaintiff contends that the Chicago Police Department has threatened him with some form of device capable of causing sleep deprivation and blackouts. It is not clear how Walworth County fits into plaintiff’s contentions. As Magistrate Judge Goodstein of this court recently explained, it is well documented that Brodzki is a habitual filer of frivolous lawsuits. See Order of May 5, 2011 in Brodzki v. City of Chicago, No. 11-C-385 (E.D. Wis.). The present case is also frivolous, and for that reason plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied and his case will be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Dockets.Justia.com THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 25th day of July, 2011. /s_____________________________ LYNN ADELMAN District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
