Bryson v. United States of America, No. 5:2013cv20956 - Document 118 (S.D.W. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 105 Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; lifting the stay; reinstating this matter to the active docket; denying Defendant's amended motion (ECF Nos. 71 , 83 , 90 and 100 ); and dismissing this civil matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/14/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (btm)

Download PDF
Bryson v. United States of America Doc. 118 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION RANDAL LEE BRYSON v. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:01-00029 Civil Action No. 5:13-20956 UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Defendant’s amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF Nos. 71, 83-1, 90, and 100) and dismiss this matter from the Court’s docket. ECF No. 105. Defendant, represented by the Federal Public Defender, conceded that the Magistrate Judge’s findings were mandated by current Fourth Circuit law but objected to preserve the issue for appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and INCORPORATES herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; LIFTS THE STAY; REINSTATES this matter to the active docket; DENIES Defendant’s amended motion (ECF Nos. 71 , 83, 90 and 100); and DISMISSES the civil matter from the docket of the Court. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: January 14, 2021 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.