Peterson v. United States of America, No. 3:2019cv00463 - Document 724 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 720 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; denying Movant's 671 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255); dismissing this civil action with prejudice; and removing it from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/1/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (hkl)

Download PDF
Peterson v. United States of America Doc. 724 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION MANGET BROWN PETERSON Movant, v. CASE NO. 3:19-0463 CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:18-00070-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 671) be denied and this civil action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of this Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 671) be DENIED and this civil action be DISMISSED, with prejudice, and REMOVED from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Dockets.Justia.com The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: July 1, 2020 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.