Gravely v. Majestro et al, No. 3:2019cv00192 - Document 13 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)

Court Description: ORDER adopting and incorporating the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; dismissing the 2 Complaint; and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/10/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
Gravely v. Majestro et al Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION RICHARD GRAVELY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-00192 ANTHONY MAJESTRO; MARVIN W. MASTERS; and BENJAMIN L. BAILEY, Defendants. ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted Proposed Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 10) and recommends that the Court dismiss the Complaint (ECF No. 2) for lack of subject matter. Plaintiff Richard Gravely, who is acting pro se, objects to this action being dismissed. Upon review, the Court FINDS that Plaintiff’s objection is without merit. Plaintiff argues the Magistrate Judge erred in applying 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to his Complaint because jurisdiction exists by virtue of Fifth Amendment and “Article III standing.” However, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff must allege a basis for subject matter jurisdiction. It is not enough for Plaintiff to assert that Defendants, who are private attorneys, violated the Fifth Amendment. As explained by the Magistrate Judge, there must be a legal basis for this Court to have subject Dockets.Justia.com matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Complaint, and Plaintiff has not alleged such a basis in his Complaint. Without subject matter jurisdiction, the Court is required to dismiss the action. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS AND INCORPORATES herein the Findings of Fact and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, DISMISSES the Complaint, and REMOVES this matter from the docket of the Court. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: December 10, 2019 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.