Bartram v. Western Regional Jail Authority et al, No. 3:2018cv01434 - Document 29 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; granting Defendants' 13 MOTION to Dismiss; dismissing the 2 Complaint, with prejudice; and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/21/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

Download PDF
Bartram v. Western Regional Jail Authority et al Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION JEREMY D. BARTRAM, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-1434 WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; CAPTAIN ALDRAGE; CAPTAIN SAVILLA; and ANY C.O. THAT HAS WORKED IN A5 SECTION, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13); dismiss the Complaint, with prejudice (ECF No. 2); and remove this matter from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13); DISMISSES the Complaint, with prejudice (ECF No. 2); and REMOVES this matter from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: November 21, 2019 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.