Villalobos v. Western Regional Jail et al, No. 3:2018cv01385 - Document 31 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 29 Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; GRANTING 11 MOTION by PrimeCare to Dismiss 2 Complaint and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment against the Western Regional Jail and REMOVING this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/21/2019. (cc: all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Download PDF
Villalobos v. Western Regional Jail et al Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION CODY ALLEN VILLALOBOS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-1385 WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court grant PrimeCare’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11), dismiss Plaintiff’s claim against the Western Regional Jail, and remove this matter from the Court’s docket. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and GRANTS PrimeCare’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11), DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claim against the Western Regional Jail, and REMOVES this matter from the Court’s docket, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Dockets.Justia.com The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: June 21, 2019 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.