Buskirk v. Wiles et al, No. 3:2015cv03503 - Document 60 (S.D.W. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 59 Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and denying Defendants' 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/22/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Buskirk v. Wiles et al Doc. 60 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION KENNETH RAY BUSKIRK, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-3503 DANIEL WILES, CHRISTOPHER BOYER and ROB BLACK, Huntington WV Police Officers, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46). Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge=s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46), consistent with the findings and recommendations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: August 22, 2017 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
