Point Service Corporation v. Pritchard Mining Company, No. 3:2009mc00145 - Document 8 (S.D.W. Va. 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the court's 3/31/2010 7 Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 5/17/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA POINT SERVICE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PRITCHARD MINING COMPANY, INC., MISCELLANEOUS NO. 3:09-0145 (U.S. Bankruptcy Nos. 3:09-ap-03006; 3:09-bk-30018) Defendant. PRITCHARD MINING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-0769 DOUG BROWN, an individual, POINT SERVICE CORPORATION, a West Virginia corporation, and POINT SERVICE COAL SALES, INC., a West Virginia corporation, Defendants, DOUG BROWN, an individual, POINT SERVICE CORPORATION, a West Virginia corporation, and POINT SERVICE COAL SALES, INC., a West Virginia corporation, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. LAW RIVER COMPANY, INC., a West Virginia limited liability company, EURO-AMERICAN COAL TRADING, INC., a New York corporation, and THEODORE SOHNEN, Third-Party Defendants. POINT SERVICE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-0373 (U.S. Bankruptcy Court Nos. 3:09-ap-03006; 3:09-bk-30018) PRITCHARD MINING COMPANY, INC., Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On March 31, 2010, the court affirmed the August 31, 2009, amended order of the bankruptcy court in Civil Action No. 3:100373; denied Point Service s Motion to Withdraw Reference and Consolidate Adversary Proceeding in Miscellaneous Case 3:09-0145; and granted in part Pritchard s Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Abstain or Remand in Civil Action No. 2:09-0769. Pursuant to the court s March 31 Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove these actions from the court s active docket. It is SO ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2010. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
