Hector v. Astrue, No. 3:2009cv00397 - Document 16 (S.D.W. Va. 2010)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; Grants Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Affirms the final decision of the Commissioner, Dismisses this matter from the Court's docket, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/28/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Download PDF
Hector v. Astrue Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA HUNTINGTON DIVISION RICHARD HENRY HECTOR, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-0397 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable R. Clark VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, grant Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this matter from the Court’s docket. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from the Court’s docket, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Dockets.Justia.com The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: September 28, 2010 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.