McGurgan v. Harman et al, No. 2:2020cv00173 - Document 9 (S.D.W. Va. 2021)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated; directing that this action is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/5/2021. (cc: pro se plaintiff; counsel of record; other unrepresented party; Unites States Magistrate Judge) (kew)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McGurgan v. Harman et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON WILLIAM MCGURGAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:20-cv-00173 LESLE HARMAN, SYDNE BREEDON, BRITNEY BREEDON, SYDNE KUHN, LEAANN BESS, and WARDEN OF SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, All in their individual capacity, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on March 9, 2021 (ECF No. 8); and the Magistrate Judge having recommended that the court dismiss this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due the plaintiff’s failure to prosecute it; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 8) be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein. It is, accordingly, ORDERED that this action be, and Dockets.Justia.com hereby it is, dismissed. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this memorandum opinion and order to the pro se plaintiff, all counsel of record, any other unrepresented party, and the United States Magistrate Judge. ENTER: April 5, 2021 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
