White v. Saul, No. 2:2019cv00622 - Document 20 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 19 Proposed Findings and Recommendation is ADOPTED and INCORPORATED herein; the Claimant's 14 request for reversal or remand is DENIED; the Defendant's 15 request to affirm the decision is GRANTED; the final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this matter is DISMISSED from this Court's docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/16/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)

Download PDF
White v. Saul Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION WILLIAM MICHAEL WHITE, SR., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-00622 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On April 14, 2020, Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation(“PF&R”), [ECF No. 19], recommending the court DENY the Claimant’s request for reversal or remand, [ECF No. 14], GRANT the Defendant’s request to affirm the decision, [ECF No. 15], AFFIRM the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISS this matter from this Court’s docket. To date, no objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s PF&R have been filed, and the time period for the filing of objections has passed. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS and INCORPORATES herein the PF&R. For the reasons stated, the court DENIES the Claimant’s request for reversal or remand, [ECF No. 14], GRANTS the Defendant’s request to affirm the decision, [ECF No. 15], Dockets.Justia.com AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this matter from this Court’s docket. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: June 16, 2020

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.