White v. Saul, No. 2:2019cv00494 - Document 12 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 11 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, denying Plaintiff's 9 Request for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting Defendant's 10 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner and dismisses this action from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/10/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca)

Download PDF
White v. Saul Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION TINA LYNN WHITE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-0494 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 9); grant Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. 10); and dismiss this action from the docket of the Court. Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for judgment on the pleadings (ECF No. 9); GRANTS Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. 10); and DISMISSES this action from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Dockets.Justia.com The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. ENTER: June 10, 2020 ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.