Loftus v. Kanawha County Sheriffs Department et al, No. 2:2018cv01345 - Document 92 (S.D.W. Va. 2021)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The findings and recommendations made in the 91 Proposed Findings and Recommendation are adopted by the court and incorporated herein; directing that the defendants' 79 motion for summary judgment is granted; th e plaintiff's claims against defendants Kanawha County Sheriff's Department, John Doe No. 1, and John Doe No. 2 are dismissed and these defendants are dismissed from this action; the plaintiff's Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims, and those under the Article III, §§ 5 and 10 of the West Virginia Constitution, against defendant Keadle are dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/14/2021. (cc: plaintiff; counsel of record; any unrepresented parties; Magistrate Judge) (kew)

Download PDF
Loftus v. Kanawha County Sheriffs Department et al Doc. 92 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON MICHAEL J. LOFTUS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01345 KANAWHA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; MS. A. KEADLE, Kanawha County Deputy Sheriff; and JOHN DOE NO. 1 and JOHN DOE NO. 2, Kanawha County Deputy Sheriffs sued in their individual and professional capacities as well as up to the coverage of their insurance policies, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on May 19, 2021 (ECF No. 91); and the Magistrate Judge having recommended that the court grant the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 79) and dismiss all the claims in the plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 2) except for his Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim against defendant A. Keadle, for which the defendants concede genuine issues of material fact remain; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings and recommendations made in the Proposed Findings and Dockets.Justia.com Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 91) be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein. Accordingly, it is further ORDERED that: 1. the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 79) be, and hereby it is, granted; 2. the plaintiff’s claims against defendants Kanawha County Sheriff’s Department, John Doe No. 1, and John Doe No. 2 be, and hereby they are dismissed, and defendants Kanawha County Sheriff’s Department, John Doe No. 1, and John Doe No. 2 be, and hereby they are, dismissed from this action; and 3. the plaintiff’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims, and those under the Article III, §§ 5 and 10 of the West Virginia Constitution, against defendant Keadle be, and hereby they are, dismissed. The sole remaining claim in this matter is the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim against defendant Keadle. By a separate order, the court will address the schedule and other matters for the remaining proceedings. The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this memorandum opinion and order to the plaintiff, all counsel of record, any unrepresented parties, and the Magistrate Judge. ENTER: June 14, 2021 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.