Jarrell v. Casebolt et al, No. 2:2018cv00989 - Document 58 (S.D.W. Va. 2019)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 MOTION by Dave Casebolt, Robert Eggleton, Don Scurlock, Steve Walker, Greg Young to Enforce Settlement and for Costs and Sanctions. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/2/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jarrell v. Casebolt et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION TIMOTHY JARRELL Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00989 DAVE CASEBOLT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is Defendants Dave Casebolt, Steve Walker, Don Scurlock, Greg Young, and Robert Eggleton’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Costs and Sanctions Against Timothy Jarrell. [ECF No. 55]. After being advised that a settlement between the parties had been reached, this Court entered an order retiring this action from the active docket on July 8, 2019. [ECF No. 54]. An agreed order of dismissal was not submitted to the Court. It appearing to the Court that the matters within this case remain unresolved, the court will reinstate the matter to the active docket and issue a revised scheduling order. As such, Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement and for Costs and Sanctions Against Timothy Jarrell, [ECF No. 55], is DENIED. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: December 2, 2019 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
