King et al v. Coloplast Corp., No. 2:2018cv00974 - Document 8 (S.D.W. Va. 2020)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/30/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
King et al v. Coloplast Corp. Doc. 8 Case 2:18-cv-00974 Document 8 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 197 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION REBECCA KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00974 COLOPLAST CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 13, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 27, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendant, Coloplast Corp., pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: November 30, 2020 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
