Todd v. Berryhill, No. 2:2016cv06184 - Document 13 (S.D.W. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Court ADOPTS the 12 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; DENIES plaintiff's 10 motion for judgment on the pleadings; GRANTS the Commissioner's 11 motion for judgment on the pleadings; AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner; and DISMISSES this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/8/2017. (cc: all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Tinsley) (mks)

Download PDF
Todd v. Berryhill Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON TERESA ANN TODD Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:16-6184 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, entered on July 18, 2017; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court affirm the final decision of the Commissioner; deny plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; and grant the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein; Dockets.Justia.com 2. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, denied; 3. The Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, granted; 4. The decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, affirmed; and 5. The action is dismissed, with prejudice, from the docket of this court. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: August 8, 5, 2016 DATED: January 2017 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.