Parsons v. Colvin, No. 2:2015cv14376 - Document 16 (S.D.W. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 15 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; denying the plaintiff's 11 motion for judgment on the pleadings; granting the defendant's 12 motion for judgment on the pleadings; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismissing the case from the docket of this court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/13/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Download PDF
Parsons v. Colvin Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON WILLIE KENT PARSONS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:15-14376 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn, entered on November 18, 2016; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court deny plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; grant defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings; affirm the final decision of the Commissioner; dismiss this matter from the court’s docket; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and it hereby is, adopted by the court and incorporated herein; 2. The plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the Dockets.Justia.com pleadings be, and it hereby is, denied; 3. The defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, granted; 4. The final decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, affirmed; and 5. The case be, and hereby is, dismissed from the docket of this court. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: December 13, 2016 DATED: January 5, 2016 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.